xml parsing - Any Alternate Solution to Xml Unmarshalling Error in Java-8? : “secure-processing org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException" -

-

note: error has been discussed here , various solutions have been suggested rid of jars conflicts java-8's default implementation.

my question extension problem.

for sake of completeness, here stacktrace facing, when run code java-8: 

feb 29, 2016 12:06:41 pm com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.util.xmlfactory createparserfactory severe: null org.xml.sax.saxnotrecognizedexception: http://javax.xml.xmlconstants/feature/secure-processing     @ org.apache.xerces.parsers.abstractsaxparser.setfeature(abstractsaxparser.java:1487)     @ org.apache.xerces.jaxp.saxparserimpl.setfeatures(saxparserimpl.java:145)     @ org.apache.xerces.jaxp.saxparserimpl.<init>(saxparserimpl.java:128)     @ org.apache.xerces.jaxp.saxparserfactoryimpl.newsaxparserimpl(saxparserfactoryimpl.java:112)     @ org.apache.xerces.jaxp.saxparserfactoryimpl.setfeature(saxparserfactoryimpl.java:140)     @ com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.util.xmlfactory.createparserfactory(xmlfactory.java:121)     @ com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.unmarshallerimpl.getxmlreader(unmarshallerimpl.java:139)     @ com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.unmarshaller.unmarshallerimpl.unmarshal(unmarshallerimpl.java:276)

to prove conflicting jar(s) indeed problem (as described in link shared earlier), did pull out relevant code different project , ran code using java-8 (i.e. without errors) bare minimum number of jars. far good.

and query:

in case, legacy project uses 2-3 known conflicting jars used various reasons. however, there new module uses annotation driven jaxb oxm processing.

the problem is : can not rid of old , conflicting jars pretty makes 10% of codebase uncompilable. however, @ same time, not wish rid of jaxb/oxm implementation in new module well.

is there way can somehow tell jvm ignore old jars , use default implementation shipped java-8 whenever code execution goes through new module?

an alternative approach use stax parser xml xmlstreamreader , have jaxb unmarshal that.

xmlinputfactory xmlinputfactory = xmlinputfactory.newinstance(); xmlstreamreader xmlstreamreader = xmlinputfactory.createxmlstreamreader(reader); unmarshaller.unmarshal(xmlstreamreader);

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more