java - TPM 32-bit key handles -

-

i've been exploring tpm world , have tried out few different libraries (i.e. trousers, jtss, jsr321, , tpm/j). based on number of requirements tpm/j fits bill , i'm able accomplish majority of operations necessary binding/unbinding, signing/verifying, etc.

however 1 issue have come across key handle. according specs issued trusted computing group, 1.2 , 2.0, both declare key handles 32-bit values. when run tpm/j , load key tpm issues key outside of 32-bit space.

for example if run following command:

sudo java edu.mit.csail.tpmj.tools.tpmloadkey testkey.key srk ""

i receive following output:

parsing command-line arguments ...  using srk parent. parentpwd = null, encoded (null [no authorization]) = null  read testkey.key ...  loading key tpm ... keyhandle = 0xc5e94bf9

if calculations (and online conversion tools found) correct key handle above computes 3,320,400,889 outside 32-bits. believe 32-bit signed values limited around 2 billion.

this becomes problem because when issue following command:

sudo java -cp $classpath edu.mit.csail.tpmj.tools.tpmunbind helloworld.txt.enc 0xc5e94bf9

i following output:

parsing command-line arguments ...  exception in thread "main" java.lang.numberformatexception: input string: "c5e94bf9"     @ java.lang.numberformatexception.forinputstring(numberformatexception.java:65)     @ java.lang.integer.parseint(integer.java:484)     @ bayanihan.util.params.params.getint(params.java:67)     @ edu.mit.csail.tpmj.tools.tpmunbind.main(tpmunbind.java:71)

just sanity check if use tpmunbind command above , wait until load key can handled java int type (i.e. falls within 32-bit range) command runs fine.

has else encountered this? in advance.

0xc5e94bf9 32 bit number.

in hexadecimal representation 1 'digit' represents 4 bits. 8-bit number ranges 0x00 0xff. 2 hex-digits, called nibbles.

16 bit 0x0000 0xffff

and case 32 bit: 0x00000000 0xffffffff

the link found signed integers states -2,147,483,648 2,147,483,647. if interprete unsigned, 0 4,294,967,296 in decimal representation. 3,320,400,889 in range.

now error get: that's bug in tpm/j. uses

integer.parseint( s.substring( 2 ), 16 );

to parse input string. parseint()-method not work hexadecimal numbers larger 0x7fffffff.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

erlang - Saving a digraph to mnesia is hindered because of its side-effects -

-
updated the digraph library in erlang implements data type side-effectful. each operation on data type saves new state in ets table -- instead of returning altered version of itself, more common in functional languages. the problem usage perspective, impedes effort store or pass around state in convenient way requiring me first "collect" state before can start juggle around. the closest solution have seen far serializer/deserializer , these have drawback tied current structure of digraphs instead of operating on abstract type -- prevents future proof solution. update pascal pointed out serializer utilizes interface of digraph, , hence eliminates drawback mentioned above. better, albeit still inconvenient, see no better alternative. what recommendation on how store digraphs? should go different data type altogether? thanks. i not sure understand concern. fact digraph stored in ets transparent in user interface, might want chnge either exchange digr...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more