64bit - Analyze 64-bit DLL from within T4 template in Visual Studio (32-bit) using Reflection -

-

i analyse dll within t4 template using reflection, can generate code based on results of reflection analysis. know envdte better option, not possible in case several reasons.

the problem reflection dll 64-bit dll , if load within t4 template badimageformatexception because trying load 64-bit dll 32-bit process (visual studio 2012).

is there way analyse contents of dll within t4, preferrably using reflection?

i have thought writing console application analyses dll, writes results xml file consumed t4 template, not favorite solution...

btw: dll managed c++ dll. roslyn no option either because supports c# , vb).

a thing worth testing if loading assembly reflection works you. did experiment bit , seems succeeds loading 64bit assembly 32bit process then. can't execute should ok if understood correctly:

for full sample at: https://github.com/mrange/codestack/tree/master/q18985529/reflect

var assembly = assembly.reflectiononlyload ("x64");  var types = assembly.gettypes ();  foreach (var type in types) {     console.writeline (type.fullname);      foreach (var field in type.getfields ())     {         console.writeline ("  {0} {1}", field.fieldtype, field.name);     }      foreach (var property in type.getproperties ())     {         console.writeline ("  {0} {1}", property.propertytype, property.name);     }  }

loading reflectiononly has drawbacks iirc it's worth it.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more