mysql - Replace the id's with name using single query -

- 

select team_with.participant1,team_with.participant2,team_with.participant3   event,team_with   team_with.for_event_no=event.event_no ,   event.event_no=4 ,   team_with.participant1=9 or   team_with.participant2=9 or   team_with.participant3=9;

i have written particular query, , obtained required id's in row. not able modify query such that, in place of these id's, names connected id's displayed.

the student_detatil table consists of pk(sam_id) , attribute name.

ids displayed present query fks connected student_detail.sam_id..

it seems bad design multiply columns storing different participants. consider creating separate row each participant , storing them in table. joining logic easier.

also, please use explicit join syntax - makes query clearer , easier understand separating join logic conditions data retrieval.

remember operator and has precedence on or, event.event_no = 4 not apply each participant condition. believe mistake, 1 judge.

as query itself, apply or conditions join, or join student_detail table thrice.

select      s1.name,     s2.name,     s3.name      event e      inner join team_with t on t.for_event_no = e.event_no     left join student_detail s1 on s1.sam_id = t.participant1     left join student_detail s2 on s2.sam_id = t.participant2     left join student_detail s3 on s3.sam_id = t.participant3     e.event_no = 4     , ( t.participant1=9 or t.participant2=9 or t.participant3=9 );

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

erlang - Saving a digraph to mnesia is hindered because of its side-effects -

-
updated the digraph library in erlang implements data type side-effectful. each operation on data type saves new state in ets table -- instead of returning altered version of itself, more common in functional languages. the problem usage perspective, impedes effort store or pass around state in convenient way requiring me first "collect" state before can start juggle around. the closest solution have seen far serializer/deserializer , these have drawback tied current structure of digraphs instead of operating on abstract type -- prevents future proof solution. update pascal pointed out serializer utilizes interface of digraph, , hence eliminates drawback mentioned above. better, albeit still inconvenient, see no better alternative. what recommendation on how store digraphs? should go different data type altogether? thanks. i not sure understand concern. fact digraph stored in ets transparent in user interface, might want chnge either exchange digr...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more