mysql - Replace the id's with name using single query -

- 

select team_with.participant1,team_with.participant2,team_with.participant3   event,team_with   team_with.for_event_no=event.event_no ,   event.event_no=4 ,   team_with.participant1=9 or   team_with.participant2=9 or   team_with.participant3=9;

i have written particular query, , obtained required id's in row. not able modify query such that, in place of these id's, names connected id's displayed.

the student_detatil table consists of pk(sam_id) , attribute name.

ids displayed present query fks connected student_detail.sam_id..

it seems bad design multiply columns storing different participants. consider creating separate row each participant , storing them in table. joining logic easier.

also, please use explicit join syntax - makes query clearer , easier understand separating join logic conditions data retrieval.

remember operator and has precedence on or, event.event_no = 4 not apply each participant condition. believe mistake, 1 judge.

as query itself, apply or conditions join, or join student_detail table thrice.

select      s1.name,     s2.name,     s3.name      event e      inner join team_with t on t.for_event_no = e.event_no     left join student_detail s1 on s1.sam_id = t.participant1     left join student_detail s2 on s2.sam_id = t.participant2     left join student_detail s3 on s3.sam_id = t.participant3     e.event_no = 4     , ( t.participant1=9 or t.participant2=9 or t.participant3=9 );

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more