javascript - Using lodash array functions on Restangular collections -

-

i'm using restangular angularjs, , iterate on collection in function of controller, need modify collection returned restangular:

var ordercontroller = [ '$scope', '$http', 'restangular',   function($scope, $http, restangular) {     $scope.orders = restangular.all('orders').getlist();     $scope.toggleorder = function(order) {       _.foreach($scope.orders, function(order) {         console.log(order); // not order!         order.someproperty = false; // goal       });     });   }];

i think problem $scope.orders promise, not actual array, _.foreach tries iterate on properties of promise instead of objects. same result angular.foreach.

how can iterate on restangular resource collections? i'd have access collection functions of lodash, such _.filter, well.

restangular.all('orders').getlist() - promise, not array.

assign list using $object:

$scope.orders = restangular.all('orders').getlist().$object;

list empty array until request complete.

update full code question (includes orders modification on request complete)

$scope.orders = [];  function modifyorders(orders){ ... }  restangular.all('orders').getlist().then(function(orders){  modifyorders(orders);  $scope.orders=orders; });  $scope.toggleorders = function(toggledorder){  _.foreach($scope.orders, function(order) { ... }); };

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more