jquery - AngularJS link not working, but manual page refresh works fine -

-

i'm working on site in angularjs. i'm having issue when click on nav links ( tag href), url changing, page content not getting updated. if click on 'about' link, url gets modified #/about, not content. however, if manually refresh page now, content loads.

see site at: www.arunmahendrakar.com/nsm/

the links 'outside' angular , i'm not sure need add $apply function, if @ all.

the nsm.controller.js has routing , controller details, nsm.services.js has service gets data server , nsm.directives.js used highlight current link.

the index.html page uses bootstrap 3.0.

please let me know how can fix issue.

there's flicker on page when navigate, angular noticing change , trying update page.

the problem looks directives.js adds listener on $location.path()

scope.$watch('location.path()', function (newpath) {...});

according discussion here, want use

$scope.$watch(function() {return location.path()}, function(path) {...});

probably call $location.path() interfering routing.

edit

the following might explain it:

services.factory('pagedata', ['$resource', '$route',    function ($resource, $route) {        // done can run e2e tests :8000 port        //debugger;        var slug = ($route.current.params.slug || 'home') + '.txt';        return $resource('http://arunmahendrakar.com/nsm/data/:slug', { slug: slug });    }]);  services.factory('pagedataloader', ['pagedata', '$q',   function (pagedata, $q) {       return function () {           var delay = $q.defer();           pagedata.query(function (pdata) {               delay.resolve(pdata);           }, function () {               delay.reject('unable fetch data');           });           return delay.promise;       };   }]);

the pagedata factory returns $resource object. called once, when page loads. pagedataloader factory returns function. function invoked each time pagedataloader instantiated.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more