git - Ruby + Compass: Permission Issues -

-

i have been having sorts of permission issues using scss + compass after pulling git repo project contains this. works great if created own sass project scratch.

inside git repo project, sass lies, run:

compass watch

...and get...

>>> change detected to: print.scss errno::eacces on line 25 of /library/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sass-3.2.10/lib/sass/../sass/cache_stores/filesystem.rb: permission denied - /applications/mamp/htdocs/dt/resources/slice/html/.sass-cache/f2469bce8a00b9f9dd394c466620079eaa696535/print.scssc

so logged in root user , ran...

chmod 777 /library/ruby

...with no luck.

when first installed ruby, used sudo install gem ***. seems use read bad idea. (such case)

tried installing fresh copy of ruby while logged in normal admin user , don't have permissions install it. 

fetching: compass-0.12.2.gem (100%) error:  while executing gem ... (gem::filepermissionerror)     don't have write permissions /library/ruby/gems/1.8 directory.

which why went sudo route. so. bit stumped on why , how fix issue. besides running off root user.

forgot add if helps: ruby 1.8.7 (2012-02-08 patchlevel 358) [universal-darwin12.0]

the issue you're having:

errno::eacces on line 25 of /library/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sass-3.2.10/lib/sass/../sass/cache_stores/filesystem.rb: permission denied - /applications/mamp/htdocs/dt/resources/slice/html/.sass-cache/f2469bce8a00b9f9dd394c466620079eaa696535/print.scssc

indicates not you're having permissions problem in /library/ruby, you're having permissions problem in /applications/mamp/htdocs/dt/resources/slice/html/.sass-cache/f2469bce8a00b9f9dd394c466620079eaa696535/. correct permissions in directory , problem should go away.

as why you're having installation issues, that's separate problem i've got no idea about!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more