printing - If i could print across network, why can't i scan? -

-

i purchased hp deskjet wifi-enabled printer (model no. 3515). set both me (in same network printer) person few miles apart me (having different isp mine) print wirelessly successfully.

the printing across network (printing network other printer connected) has been set-up , tested both through google cloud print , hp eprint software.

however, when comes scanning across network, or cloud scan may call it, none of these 2 support, or about, it. talking hp customer care executive fruitless expectedly got no better answer 'it not possible'. also, unfortunately, have not found worthwhile on internet regarding either.

what understand - if printing done wirelessly across network, scanning. after all, in both same thing in opposite direction. is, in layman's terms, if not wrong, in printing convert digital information hardcopy document, , in scanning other way round.

please correct me if assuming many things wrong.

hp eprint email based, i.e. printer acts email client polls mailbox print jobs. when print cloud, printjob goes printer's mailbox , printer fetches job there. pretty one-way, in sense send off print job , hope gets printed , there can many different clients submitting print jobs same printer.

scanning more complex , requires working two-way communication, i.e. computer interacting scanner tell do preview scan, selecting scannable areas/size, setting resolutions, etc. while getting instantaneous responses , data scanner. not feasible via mailbox, , @ least not via printer's mailbox cannot read results mailbox.

you think possible scanner send scanned pages your mailbox, guess implementation not there yet. there security implications, such bad idea start scan job remote location, because bad guy try scan whatever secret document happen have placed in scanner. if initiate scan scanner , there select email address send results to, should secure enough. guess developers @ hp saving features next generation of multi-purpose devices can sell new device next year.. :)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more