linux - Move newly created file -

-

i have following code , after transcode finishes wish move newly created file. after, don't want write other folder trancodes. why presume using exec better processed if previous exec read true. note there maybe more 1 file in current folder.

#!/bin/bash # # change specify different handbrake preset. can list them running:     "handbrakecli --preset-list" # preset="appletv 2" if [ -z "$1" ] ; transcodedir="/path/to/folder" else transcodedir="$1" fi find "$transcodedir"/* -type f -exec bash -c 'handbrakecli -i "$1" -o "${1%.*}".mp4 --    preset="$preset"' __ {} \; -exec rm {} \;

my little knowledge of linux thought maybe:

#!/bin/bash # # change specify different handbrake preset. can list them running:     "handbrakecli --preset-list" # preset="appletv 2" if [ -z "$1" ] ; transcodedir="/path/to/folder" else transcodedir="$1" fi find "$transcodedir"/* -type f -exec bash -c 'handbrakecli -i "$1" -o "${1%.*}".mp4 --    preset="$preset"' __ {} \; -exec rm {} \; -exec mv '"${1%.*}".mp4'     "/path to/converted/folder" \;

but puts out:

mv: cannot stat â"${1%.*}".mpâ4: no such file or directory

now thought maybe characters notepad++ hiding in there somewhere ran through dos2uunix. still getting same error.

now thinking "${1%.}".mp4 isn't getting newly create file rather looking file called "${1%.}".mp4, doesn't exist.

any appreciated.

find not support parameter substitutions, need pass ${1%.*} shell. fortunately, that's not hard do:

find "$transcodedir" -type f -exec bash -c 'handbrakecli -i "$1" -o "${1%.*}".mp4 --    preset="$preset";     rm "$1";     mv "${1%.*}".mp4 "/path/to/converted/folder"' _ {} \;

so clarify; "top level" find -exec bash -c '...' _ {} \; , bash script inside single quotes contains 3 commands, of operate on same input file.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more