c# - ASP.NET MVC '@model dynamic' not recognizing Model properties when partial view is in Shared folder -

-

not duplicate of: mvc razor dynamic model, 'object' not contain definition 'propertyname'

according answers there,

according david ebbo, can't pass anonymous type dynamically-typed view because anonymous types compiled internal. since cshtml view compiled separate assembly, can't access anonymous type's properties.

why code below - allegedly should never work - work had expected when partial view located in "/home/_partial.cshtml", stops working when moved "/shared/_partial.cshtml"?

using asp.net 4.5 (and previous versions), following produces text "hello, world!" web browser:

~/controllers/homecontroller.cs

using system; using system.collections.generic; using system.linq; using system.web; using system.web.mvc;  namespace testdynamicmodel.controllers {     public class homecontroller : controller     {         public actionresult index()         {             return view();         }     } }

~/views/home/index.cshtml

@html.partial("_partial", new { text = "hello, world!", shouldrender = true } )

~/views/home/_partial.cshtml

@model dynamic @if (!model.shouldrender) {     <p>nothing see here!</p> } else {     <p>@model.text</p> }

however, when _partial.cshtml instead moved ~/views/shared/_partial.cshtml, following error thrown in _partial.cshtml (line 2):

'object' not contain definition 'shouldrender'

upon inspecting model in debugger, find following properties:

model { text = hello, world!, shouldrender = true }

while question pertaining behavior of asp.net mvc, , aware of workarounds, not sure is. here workaround wants code work: dynamic anonymous type in razor causes runtimebinderexception


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more