Hazelcast and spring boot -

-

i'm using spring boot 1.3.3 , hazelcast build looks like:

            <plugin>             <groupid>org.springframework.boot</groupid>             <artifactid>spring-boot-maven-plugin</artifactid>             <version>${spring.boot.version}</version>             <configuration>                 <executable>true</executable>                 <layout>zip</layout>                 <embeddedlaunchscriptproperties>                     <mode>service</mode>                     <usestartstopdaemon>false</usestartstopdaemon>                 </embeddedlaunchscriptproperties>             </configuration>             <executions>                 <execution>                     <goals>                         <goal>repackage</goal>                     </goals>                 </execution>             </executions>         </plugin>          <dependency>             <groupid>com.hazelcast</groupid>             <artifactid>hazelcast-all</artifactid>             <version>${hazelcast.version}</version>         </dependency>

when service executed in linux see in log:

org.springframework.web.util.nestedservletexception: handler processing failed; nested exception java.lang.noclassdeffounderror: com/hazelcast/cluster/impl/operations/wanreplicationoperation     @ org.springframework.web.servlet.dispatcherservlet.triggeraftercompletionwitherror(dispatcherservlet.java:1302) ~[spring-webmvc-4.2.4.release.jar!/:4.2.4.release]     @ org.springframework.web.servlet.dispatcherservlet.dodispatch(dispatcherservlet.java:977) ~[spring-webmvc-4.2.4.release.jar!/:4.2.4.release]

but see hazelcast-all.jar in fat jar clue?

the issue caused spring-boot script. due fact service stop didnt kill process , still alive start failed execute , throw such exception in logs. still dont understand why cant find hazelcast classes , rest ok


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more