c# - EF: mapping class properties to Rows not Columns -

-

do have idea how map properties of class rows in table? let's have table [id, key, value].

i have predefined key values (on attributes example) mapped properties in class, values taken value column.

example:

table

 --------------------------------- | id  | key        | value        |  --------------------------------- | 1   | name       | jon          |  --------------------------------- | 2   | surname    | doe          |  ---------------------------------

class

public class bar {     public string name { get; set; }     public string suname { get; set; } }

is there in ef achieve or have write own custom code?

br

you can't map values column properties. have key-value table, suggest read table content dictionary.

first, should have entity properties correspond table column names:

public class foo {    public string key { get; set; }    public string value { get; set; } }

after map entity table, can read table content dictionary:

var values = context.foos.todictionary(f => f.key, f => f.value);

now can values keys:

var name = values["name"];

you can use dictionary backing store properties:

public void bar {     private dictionary<string, string> values =           context.foos.todictionary(f => f.key, f => f.value);      public string name { { return values["name"]; } }     public string surname { { return values["surname"]; } } }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more