How Can I Run a legacy Classic ASP Site with Cybercash on 64 bit Windows Server 2008 R2 -

-

i have classic asp site running on old hardware , windows 2000. need migrate new hardware running windows server 2008 r2 64 bit. in particular, need reinstall ancient cybercash credit card clearing software. have merchant kit download, when try run mck-3.2.0.4-nt.exe, won't run because 16 bit app. how can around roadblock?

i posted question answer it, because had this, , thought answers may of interest others. according techie @ paypal, many tens of thousands of sites still run cybercash. others may doing migration mine.

the trick here recognize mck-3.2.0.4-nt.exe program unzip program. run on windows 2000 server, creating need in directory c:\mck-3.2.0.4-nt. classic asp need 4 files under c:\mck-3.2.0.4-nt\asp-api. may have been unzipped elsewhere, should able find , copy new server.

there 4 include files: ccmckdirectlib.inc,ccmcklib.inc, ccmsw.inc, , ccvarblock.inc , subdirectory cychmck. include files should have been copied ever directory contains credit card clearing asp page. if copied website files old server new server, should there.

now have install active x component, cychmck.dll in cychmck directory. run classic asp on iis 7+ need have app pool set run 32 bit applications. need install dll command line looks this:

\windows\syswow64\regsvr32 /s cychmck.dll

once cybercash installed, credit card clearing asp page should run on new server did on old server.

no 1 likes use old software new projects, code works , has run years hard beat. can teach new old tricks :)

i appreciate resource: http://winsupport.org/cybercash.html


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more