reporting services - SSRS hidden rows cause KeepWithGroup to not work -

-

i have report consists of single table 3 groups. last group has 6 rows in it's footer. each of these rows has keepwithgroup set before , of them can hidden conditionally. when of rows visible, footer rows kept on same page detail possible. however, when 1 of hidden conditions evaluates true row hidden correctly other rows moved next page though fit fine on current page.

if @ groups in advanced mode see this

(static)

(group1)

(static)

(group2)

(static)  (static)  (group3)    (static)    (static)      (static)       -- don't know why here        (group4)  -- detail    (static)

(static)

(static)

(static)

(static)

(static)

(static)

all of static rows after detail have keepwithgroup set before, seems ignored when of them hidden.

i've tried setting hidden condition on table row , on static row in advanced mode both cause issue.

any ideas?

thanks,

bill

i have 2 ideas try:

  1. in setting advanced properties of grouping try change 'hidden' property expression evaluating if there data in parent grouping. 

    =iif( fields!(parentitem).value != nothing, false, true)

  2. is okay repeat 1 of groups on page break? forcing page breaks in experience helps keeping data more not. , tweaking options of 'keeptogether' true of 'static' members , maybe attempting change 'keepwithgroup' after instead.

i know avoid advanced mode of groupings unless there issue display sounds have fell unfortunately. while debugging may wish see if remove highest parent group if problem still persists see layout causing issues at. know groups shared dependent members across multiple heirarchies there can issues. attempt doing subreport know works called child of parent member while debugging. not final result kind disjointed imho, may see dependency problem lies.

i saw article posted had similar issues: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2008/10/13/repeat-header-and-visible-fixed-header-table.aspx


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more