ruby - rails: how to have a FactoryGirl for all my states -

-

say have event_type model has few event types such "live","used","offline".

those types used in other model called event. now, when testing, need have types populated on every run. more specific, event factory:

factory :event |e|     e.event_type {|v| v.association(:event_type)}     e.latitude 40.767929000000     e.longitude -73.985742000000 end

i tried on event factory:

after(:create) {|event|   factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "live"})   factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "used"})   factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "offline"}) }

the problem approach if create more 1 event object event types created again each event use.

what better approach?

thanks,

you have in _spec running test. (or test)

in rspec you'd in before block @ top of spec. 

require 'spec_helper'  describe event     before      factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "live"})     factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "used"})     factorygirl.create(:event_type, {:name => "offline"})    end    "tests something"      ...   end  end

also you're trying trait made ... in factory

factory :event |e|    e.latitude 40.767929000000   e.longitude -73.985742000000    trait :live     e.event_type = "live"   end    trait :used     e.event_type = "used"   end    trait :offline     e.event_type = "offline"   end    # defining these not necessary may save time   factory :event_live, traits: [:live]   factory :event_used, traits: [:used]   factory :event_offline, traits: [:offline] end

which allow create factories based on them such:

factorygirl.create :event, :live

or call "unnecessary factories" shown above

factorygirl.create :event_live

however if event_type association might need traits defined in separate factory can leverage this:

trait :live    e.association :event_type, factory: :event_type end

hope helps!

you may want leverage database cleaner gem clear out items between each run don't run unique validation errors.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more