twitter bootstrap 3 - Disabling responsiveness and Column ordering -

-

i have problems column ordering after disabling responsiveness in bootstrap 3.

<div class="row">     <div class="col-xs-9 col-md-push-3">...</div>     <div class="col-xs-3 col-md-pull-9">...</div> </div>

if so, affect layout on resolution below 1024 - blocks change places. i've tried solutions, one...

<div class="row">     <div class="col-xs-9 col-xs-push-3">...</div>     <div class="col-xs-3 col-xs-pull-9">...</div> </div>

... , one...

<div class="row">     <div class="col-md-9 col-md-push-3">...</div>     <div class="col-md-3 col-md-pull-9">...</div> </div>

... , none of them work properly.

i want disable responsiveness , force col-9 block go first in html document , col-3 go after @ resolution, col-3 block (sidebar) must aligned left , col-9 block (main content) must aligned right. suggestions?

also read http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#disable-responsive , /or try maybe. https://github.com/bassjobsen/non-responsive-tb3. using col-xs-* classes seems right (cause never stack). xs grid don't have pull, push , offset classes.

add float right seems solution in case:

<div class="container" style="background-color:white;">     <div class="row">     <div class="col-xs-9" style="background-color:red;float:right;">right</div>     <div class="col-xs-3" style="background-color:yellow;">left</div>     </div>     <div class="row">     <div class="col-xs-9" style="background-color:green;">right</div>     <div class="col-xs-3" style="background-color:blue;">left</div>     </div> </div>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more