jquery - Magnific Popup - popup within a popup. How to make "close" go to previous popup? -

-

i've got basic setup:

 $('.ajax-popup-link').magnificpopup({         type: 'ajax',         callbacks: {             ajaxcontentadded: function () {                 $('.image-link').magnificpopup();             };         } });

what i'd have close event of "image-link" popup go original popup. first thought grab original element , maybe pass 2nd popup, bind close event element... when closes, automatically popsup original one.

has else done this? there better way possibly this?

probably, way achieve want take original element , reopen it. passing 2nd popup's close callback won't give anything, since never called. magnificpopup not fire open event if popup opened, because there 1 instance of magnific popup object. can check if curritem equal 1st popup's item.

var childopened,     parentitem,     $parent = $('.ajax-popup-link'); $parent.magnificpopup({     type: 'ajax',     callbacks: {         open: function () {             // triggered when 1st popup opens             // save 1st popup's item             parentitem = this.curritem;             // not register new callbacks if pass them             $('.image-link').magnificpopup();         },         close: function () {             // called twice, since opened popup twice             // not move `afterclose`. `curritem` not available there             childopened = (this.curritem !== parentitem);         },         afterclose: function () {             if (childopened) {                 // should in `afterclose` avoid conflicts                 // previous popup opening                 $parent.magnificpopup('open');             }         }     } });

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more