rails 4.2 link_to method: No route matches [POST] -

-

i'm trying construct link_to method: :delete call destroy method in users controller:

<%= link_to 'disable token', user_path(user), method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'are sure?'} %>

which generates html looks like:

<a data-confirm="are sure?" rel="nofollow" data-method="delete" href="/users/6">disable token</a>

my application.js file has:

//= require jquery                                                                                                                                             //= require jquery_ujs

and, in fact, know javascript loaded , doing supposed to, because generates 'are sure?` alert dialog.

however, when following link following:

no route matches [post] "/users/9"

and indeed there no such route, because routes are:

users_path  /users(.:format)    users#index user_path   delete  /users/:id(.:format)    users#destroy

the mystery (to me) why rails doing post route in first place? you'll note url correct ("/users/9") http verb not: post.

the parameters of request getting set:

{"_method"=>"delete",  "authenticity_token"=>"vcavjf1/f9mwjni4gptertdiyjkobniof0hiqvf+3bvmzuniohymm2z3w2sqsljqj11sz/tiht78aa9 }

here can see _method key being set delete should be, why routing error?!?

i'm stumped.

edit: if change link_to call include remote: true rails routes proper route! so, "fix" i've changed controller use ujs, don't because, well, far can tell had before should work!

here link_to call sends proper delete request js:

<%= link_to 'disable token', u, method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'are sure?'}, remote: true %>

just try explicitly stating controller action , method (note @user.id example, may referencing differently) url_for:

<%= link_to 'disable token', url_for(action: :destroy, id: @user.id), method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'are sure?'} %>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more