Function for Range for floats in python -

-

i have define own floating-point version of range() here. works same built-in range() function can accept float values.start, stop, , step integer or float numbers , step non-zero value , can negative.

i have tried looking answers on stackoverflow of them work positive step. keep getting stuck on test tests value (0,0.25,-1) i'm hundred percent sure there quicker , faster implement because program takes long time test values. can me create function , can't user imported tools.

def float(start,stop,step):   x = start   my_list = []   if start < stop:     while x<stop:         my_list.append(x)         if x < 0:             x-=step         elif x > 0:             x+=step         else:             x+=step     return my_list   if start > stop:     while x<=start , x>stop:         my_list.append(x)         if x < 0:             x=step         elif x > 0:             x+=step         else:             x+=step     return my_list

the main reason you're getting answers wrong top level if statements wrong. don't want @ boundaries when deciding way move. it's legal ask range has nothing in (with e.g. stop less start positive step).

here's how i'd minimally adjust code work properly:

def float_range(start,stop,step):     x = start     my_list = []     if step > 0:         while x < stop:             my_list.append(x)             x += step     else: # should if step < 0 check step == 0          while x > stop:             my_list.append(x)             x += step     return my_list

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more