jquery .next() skips selected elements separated by <br> tags -

-

why doesn't jquery's .next() function return next selected item when items separated <br> tags?

here's code taken jqueryui website demo area:

<!doctype html>  <html lang="en"> <head>   <meta charset="utf-8" />   <title>jquery ui button - icons</title>   <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css" />   <script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.js"></script>   <script src="http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js"></script>   <link rel="stylesheet" href="/resources/demos/style.css" />   <script>   $(function() {     $( "button:first" ).button({       icons: {         primary: "ui-icon-locked"       },       text: false     }).next().button({       icons: {         primary: "ui-icon-locked"       }     }).next().button({       icons: {         primary: "ui-icon-gear",         secondary: "ui-icon-triangle-1-s"       }     }).next().button({       icons: {         primary: "ui-icon-gear",         secondary: "ui-icon-triangle-1-s"       },       text: false     });   });   </script> </head> <body>  <button>button icon only</button> <button>button icon on left</button> <button>button 2 icons</button> <button>button 2 icons , no text</button>   </body>  </html>

this results in display like:

correct display

but if insert <br> tag after first element, next .button() call skipped resulting in following display:

incorrect display

the second .next().button( ... "ui-icon-locked" ...) function seems skipped , rest of .next().button() functions off-by-one.

i can fix using ids, creating buttonset , styling , i'm sure there other ways too, there jquery selections , <br> tags missing here?

.next() return next element. passing parameter function "condition". if condition isnt met, jquery object empty.

you can use .nextall() :first counter this:

 $('button:first').button(...).nextall('button:first') //and on , on

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more