How to decrease the size of the <tabview> buttons when are orientation:"left", using PrimeFaces -

- 

<p:tabview orientation="left" dynamic="false" cache="false" style="font-size: 70% !important; **wight:300px**; border: none;">     <p:tab title="mainboard" id="mainboard" style="font-size: 70% !important; width:200px">         <p:scrollpanel style="width:800px;height: 600px;border: none;"  mode="native">             <ui:include src="/mainboard.xhtml" />         </p:scrollpanel>     </p:tab>      <p:tab title="secboard" id="secboard" style="font-size: 70% !important; width:200px">         <p:scrollpanel style="width:800px;height: 600px;border: none;"  mode="native">             <ui:include src="/secboard.xhtml" />         </p:scrollpanel>     </p:tab> </p:tabview>

* *wight:300px tabview * * - doesn't work.

you need include separate css file , set .ui-tabs-left > .ui-tabs-nav width. tested code below various sizes, , seems work. 

.ui-tabs-left > .ui-tabs-nav {     width:300px !important;     }

you may run trouble content panel being forced below tabs. used following code prevent happening on project created while back.

.ui-tabs-left > .ui-tabs-panels {     height:100% !important;     float:right !important;     width:89% !important;     }  .ui-tabs-left > .ui-tabs-nav {     float:left !important;     width:10% !important;     height:100% !important;     }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more