java - More compact Eclipse autocomplete code -

-

eclipse great in suggesting standard pieces of code when needed , helping in autocompleting hints code.

for example, in adt, if write piece of code:

runnable r = new

if press ctrl-space get, automatically:

runnable r = new runnable() {      @override     public void run() {         // todo auto-generated method stub      } };

it's fantastic! generally, after this, spend little of time compact waste of space , make this:

runnable r = new runnable() {     @override public void run() {     }};

now question is: there way instruct eclipse make more compact code, similar latest one? there option, or there code can change?

obviously example, not complaining runnable() autocomplete code in itself, , it's not complain, eclipse behave differently in any similar case.

thank you

you can following 2 steps:

step 1

create java formatting rules.

to edit code formatting style go preferences> java> code style> formatting. starting built in style create own.

in particular may interested in new lines, blank lines , control statement tabs have liberty of changing many settings.

step 2.

go preferences> java> editor> save actions , enable perform selected actions on save , check format source code.

formatting immediately:

in case don't want wait save command apply format:

  • any java template can inserted in editor formatting rules applied. make sure use code formatter checked every template. best solution question
  • you can apply formatting ctrl+shift+f
  • you can force save all when building, practically, every time build, format.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more