javascript - Show sections based on value of Check box in jQuery (SharePoint 2010) -

-

i trying use jquery show section if user selects checkbox in sharepoint form. have had success doing button , simple checkbox 1 value show blog post http://akanoongo.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-hide-fields-in-sharepoint-list.html, struggling if select multiple values.

<script type="text/javascript" src="/siteassets/libraries/jquery-1.10.2.min.js"></script> <script> $(document).ready(function(){   $("nobr:contains('desk calendars')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('calendar refills')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('spiral bound')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('wall calendars')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('misc. calendars')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('franklin covey')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('comments')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  $("nobr:contains('retention policy')").parent('h3').parent('td').parent('tr').hide();  });  </script>

it appear value needs if statement contains value not click function. not sure though.

$("input[title$='showfields']").click(function()

basically if select wall calendars should show jsut wall calendar if wall , desk, should toggle them both.

any guidance fantastic. thank you!

edit: change answer based on comment below

to want i'll use library created called sharepointplus (please load jquery , sharepointplus in page). javascript code like:

// hide rows default $sp().formfields("desk calendars,calendar refills,spiral bound,wall calendars,misc. calendars,franklin covey,comments,retention policy").row().hide(); // add trigger when click checkbox $sp().formfields("calendar type").elem().on('click', function(event) {   // value of checkbox found "title" attribute parent   // if it's checked, show row, if it's not hide   $sp().formfields($(this).parent().attr("title")).row().toggle(this.checked) })

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more