excel - Requesting Special Macro - Replacing constants and formulas -

-

this might sound dumb, please excuse me that. can me out.

situation: have worksheet (not whole workbook) contains constants (assumption values, manually fed in sheet) , formulas (again assumption values, not constants). these assumption values accessed 1000's of cells in whole workbook.

problem: other people in other departments, forcibly have open huge excel file add assumptions in, , pcs slow that.

goal: goal can take out assumption tab out of huge excel sheet , make separate excel sheet, people other departments can update separate file , own huge excel file pull data in , let other tabs in huge excel file use these user inputted values.

what trying is, trying write special macro:

1) searches constants in worksheet (not book), searches dependent cells in whole workbook, , replaces formulas in dependent tabs, refer new assumption sheet want take out of huge excel file.

also, dependent cells have formulas refer fixed cell within assumption sheet. formula them ...'assumptions'!$j$34...notice $ signs.

right now, manually going each assumption tab cell constant, getting address, doing ctrl + f , replace dependent cell's formulas new sheet's corresponding cell address. keeping new separated sheet , cells @ exact corresponding address in huge excel sheet. tough, since constants in assumptions tab 100s in number (the huge file 13 years old, hence sucky)

please let me know if possible via 1 macro? if not, can goal achieved via multiple macros?

or: there way, can link multiple cells of sheet, multiple corresponding cells of sheet eg: linked b -> value in cell = "=b".

i macro a's in particular range new values of bs other sheet eg new value in = "=newvalueof_b".

i not sure if can post other forums? can i?

if i'm understanding problem, goal have exact duplicate of assumption sheet in file , change formulas link new file.

if i'm right don't need macro that. can create new file, , replace changing 'assumptions'! '[new file name.xlsx]assumptions'!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more