Is Visual Studio the same thing as Visual C++ -

-

this 1 of questions utterly obvious except uninitiated. so, @ risk of losing "geek card" i'm afraid must bite bullet , ask:

is visual studio same thing visual c++? need install visual studio express, example in conjunction wit visual c++? visual c++ provide things need (particular respect assembly programming) don't come visual studio express?

the question might seem basic not require answer. alas, that's precisely why feel need ask it, can't find answers online. results "assume" user knows answer question, can't seem find explicitly states 2 applications provide precisely same functionality or not.

thank time.

visual studio refers microsoft's integrated development envrioment, includes support c++, c#, basic, , several other languages.
visual-c++ refers c++ specific component of visual-studio.

one can install visual-studio (express, or other version), , install only c++ component. installing "visual-c++" component of visual studio.

also, take note microsoft have been known take small liberties adherence c++ standard. example depreciating many standard functions in faviour of 'secure' versions. (although can disabled). implementing c++17 features.

as such visual-c++ language can considered different enough c++ superset degree. visual-c++ command-line compiler (msvc) packaged separately, 1 doesn't need entire visual-studio package use it. that no longer case , are avalible again

in short - visual-c++ part of greater visual-studio package, , included in modern versions of visual-studio.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more

erlang - Saving a digraph to mnesia is hindered because of its side-effects -

-
updated the digraph library in erlang implements data type side-effectful. each operation on data type saves new state in ets table -- instead of returning altered version of itself, more common in functional languages. the problem usage perspective, impedes effort store or pass around state in convenient way requiring me first "collect" state before can start juggle around. the closest solution have seen far serializer/deserializer , these have drawback tied current structure of digraphs instead of operating on abstract type -- prevents future proof solution. update pascal pointed out serializer utilizes interface of digraph, , hence eliminates drawback mentioned above. better, albeit still inconvenient, see no better alternative. what recommendation on how store digraphs? should go different data type altogether? thanks. i not sure understand concern. fact digraph stored in ets transparent in user interface, might want chnge either exchange digr...
Read more