java - Is it possible to specify a default View for all Jersey resource methods? -

-

here's situation.

i've large codebase using jersey 2.17, jackson 2.6.3, , spring 4.2.0.

i have quite few models small subset of properties exposed @jsonproperty. rest excluded default.

there many jersey resource methods are not using jsonview annotation.

enter me. need write new internal api endpoints expose different subset of internal/confidential model properties. i've annotated these "private" properties @jsonproperty , @jsonview(supersecretandinternal.class).

the original, public, properties i've added @jsonview(publicforeveryone.class) annotation.

the problem there many many resource method handlers don't use specify jsonview. result properties (publicforeveryone , supersecretandintenal alike) being exposed.

edit. adding example code.

// pojo - before @jsonautodetect(gettervisibility = none, isgettervisibility = none, fieldvisibility = none) class person {      @jsonproperty     string name;     @jsonproperty     string age;      date createddate;     string socialsecuritynumber;      // getters/setters not shown }

this used in jersey method handler in publicapiresource

@get @path("/people") public person getuser(@pathparam("name") string name) { // user name, return user }

and result in json:

{ name: "jane", age: 20 }

now, come along , want expose sensitive fields of pojo in alternate , private/internal api. modify pojo so:

// pojo - after @jsonautodetect(gettervisibility = none, isgettervisibility = none, fieldvisibility = none) class person {      @jsonproperty     @jsonview(publicforeveryone.class)     string name;      @jsonproperty     @jsonview(publicforeveryone.class)     string age;      @jsonproperty     @jsonview(supersecretandinternal.class)     date createddate;      @jsonproperty     @jsonview(supersecretandinternal.class)     string socialsecuritynumber;      // getters/setters not shown }

while creating views:

public class views {      public static class publicforeveryone     {}     public static class supersecretandinternal extends publicforeveryone     {} }

and create a new jersey resource handler in privateapiresource

@get @path("/internal/secret/people") @jsonview( supersecretandinternal.class ) public person getuser(@pathparam("name") string name) { // user name, return user }

which returns json:

{ name: "jane", age: 20, createddate: xxx, socialsecuritynumber: 123  }

but original publicapiresource returns entire person pojo because not have @jsonview annotation. in simple example add annotation , done, in real codebase, there many resources, not mention instances people pojo nested field in other models.

question: there way specify default jsonview per pojo/model? intent such if jersey resource method handler, not specify @jsonview, default 1 used, instead of exposing every @jsonproperty annotated property.

if not, know way can achieve this, without modifying resource method handlers (because can't)?

could provide default serializer pojo serializers "default" view, somehow allows explicit views pass through?

what can configure default inclusion/exclusion, think not solve problem. have check jsonfilter http://wiki.fasterxml.com/jacksonfeaturejsonfilter, has feature defined default filter can applied pojos/models.

example pojo:

class person{     string name;     string age;     date createddate; } class user{     string username;     string password;     date createddate; }

customannotationinspector:

public class customintrospector extends jacksonannotationintrospector {   @override   public object findfilterid(annotatedclass ac) {     // let's default current behavior if annotation found:     object id = super.findfilterid(ac);     // use simple class name if not     if (id == null) {        id = "default_filter";     }     return id; }

plug obejctmapper:

objectmapper mapper = new objectmapper();  // create filter id "default_filter" , configure exclude 'createddate' property. filterprovider filters = new simplefilterprovider().addfilter("default_filter", simplebeanpropertyfilter.serializeallexcept("createddate"));  jacksonannotationintrospector jai = new customintrospector ();  // plug custom annotation use "default_filter" if pojo doesn't have @jsonfilter annotation. string jsonperson = mapper.setannotationintrospector(jai).writer(filters).writevalueasstring(new person()); string jsonuser = mapper.setannotationintrospector(jai).writer(filters).writevalueasstring(new user());

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more