ios - pod lib lint fails implicit declaration of function 'DLog' is invalid in C99 -

-

i tried declare macro on prefix.pch file works great on xcode , passes validation on travis.

my macro looks like:

#ifndef release

#define dlog(__format__, ...) nslog((@"%s [line %d] " __format__), __pretty_function__, __line__, ##__va_args__)

#else

#define dlog(...)

#endif

my podspec file this:

pod::spec.new |s|

s.name = "myexampleproject" s.version = "1.0.1" s.summary = "xxx"

s.homepage = "xxxxxx"

s.license = {:type => 'mit', :file => 'license.md' }

s.author = { "xx" => "xx@xx.com" }

s.platform = :ios, "8.0"

s.source = { :git => "https://github.com/xx/xx.git", :branch => "master", :tag => s.version }

s.source_files = "myexampleproject//.{h,m}" s.public_header_files = "myexampleproject//.{h}"

s.requires_arc = true end

when running pod lib lint myexampleproject.podspec get:

myexampleproject (1.0.1)

- error | [ios] xcodebuild: returned unsuccessful exit code. can use--verbosefor more information.

- warn | [ios] xcodebuild: ../myexampleclass.m:87:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'dlog' invalid in c99 [-wimplicit-function-declaration]

i found answer here: apptentive-ios

i needed manually add contents of prefix.pch reason xcodebuild not reading it. in case, moved content of prefix.pch unmbrella header.

this how podspec looks now:

pod::spec.new |s|

s.name = "myexampleproject" s.version = "1.0.1" s.summary = "xxx"

s.homepage = "xxxxxx"

s.license = {:type => 'mit', :file => 'license.md' }

s.author = { "xx" => "xx@xx.com" }

s.platform = :ios, "8.0"

s.source = { :git => "https://github.com/xx/xx.git", :branch => "master", :tag => s.version }

s.prefix_header_contents = '#import "myexampleproject.h"'

s.source_files = "myexampleproject//.{h,m}" s.public_header_files = "myexampleproject//.{h}"

s.requires_arc = true end

the full project can seen here: easydoanloadsession


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more