Building ios corePlot with Xcode 5.0 using a Dependent project scenario -

-

i new ios , writing ios 7.0 app uses coreplot (latest version 1.3). had "build active architecture" set yes - during development, did not run linking problem (i used static linking method described @ https://code.google.com/p/core-plot/wiki/usingcoreplotinapplications

then built , deployed on device (iphone 4, ios 7). worked fine - dont remember if asked change build settings or not. today morning, when tried run same code on simulator started giving me linker error. after doing research, realized need set build active architecture no , rebuild core plot using "dependent project install" strategy. stuck @ point need set header files search path. compilation fails detect header file. coreplot in directory coreplot_1.3.

the main linking error reads "ignoring file /users/rmenon/documents/developer/moneytrail/moneytrail/libcoreplot-cocoatouch.a, missing required architecture x86_64 in file /users/rmenon/documents/developer/moneytrail/moneytrail/libcoreplot-cocoatouch.a (3 slices)"

as part of attempt solve this, tried load coreplot project separately, change architecure stndard (armv7 nd armv7s) , tried build it. 2 deprecation errors below. in getting me compile library ios 7 can use same setting in debug , device appreciated! thank you!

enter image description here enter image description here

you'll need update newer version of core plot. has been updated work xcode 5 , ios 7, haven't done release changes yet. can pull latest code mercurial or wait next release, should (within next week or so).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more