c# - Optional params[] array being named, can i do this? -

-

this question has answer here:

here logging signature

public static void debug(string message,exception exception = null,object model = null,object userid = null,[callermembername] string membername = "",params object[] formatparams)

and trying use like

logger.debug("my message: {0} {1}", formatparams:1,2)

how can this? cannot find on net, hope possible. tried anon type didnt work.

logger.debug("my message: {0} {1}", formatparams: new{1,2})

resolution: ended using example below. getting different errors other syntax wanted make sure saved here.

logger.debug("my message: {0} {1} {2}", formatparams: new object[] { 1, "string", 123.12m });

edit: issue having ended being related dynamic being passed in formatparams, fixed casting type before logging it.

yes, can. have call array this:

logger.debug("my message: {0} {1}", formatparams: new object[] { 1, 2 });

for single parameter, isn't necessary, can use:

logger.debug("my message: {0}", formatparams: 1);

note in many cases, can use implicitly typed array:

logger.debug("my message: {0} {1}", formatparams: new[] { 1, 2 });

however, pass array of objects contains single array of integers. parameter value this:

new object[] { new int[] { 1, 2 } }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more