asp.net mvc - Castle Windsor - How to register MVC controllers in web.config -

-

i use own dependency injection framework. extremely lightweight , job, looking aspect oriented programming , need better. testing castle windsor because of it's capability proxy-based runtime interception.

i wrote simple mvc application using castle windsor installing web.config , works fine. problem had register each controller individually. in application lot of controllers, become tedious.

web.config 

<castle>   <components>     <component id="loggerinterceptor" type="mvcapp.loggerinterceptor, mvcapp" lifestyle="singleton"/>     <component name="accountcontroller" type="mvcapp.controllers.accountcontroller, mvcapp" lifestyle="transient">       <interceptors>         <interceptor>${loggerinterceptor}</interceptor>       </interceptors>     </component>     <component name="homecontroller" type="mvcapp.controllers.homecontroller, mvcapp" lifestyle="transient">       <interceptors>         <interceptor>${loggerinterceptor}</interceptor>       </interceptors>     </component>         </components> </castle>

using fluent registration api method of registration, possible register of controllers in single line of code. unfortunately, defeats purpose of using runtime proxies. if want aop configuration compile code, use postsharp compile time weaving.

fluent registration api

public void install(iwindsorcontainer container, iconfigurationstore store) {     container.register(classes.fromthisassembly()              .basedon<icontroller>()              .lifestyletransient()              .configure((c => c.lifestyle.transient.interceptors<loginterceptor>()))); }

i registering controllers having in code not issue, want determine dependencies, parameters , interceptors used via config.

so ...

is there way register of controllers via web.config single component element?

or

is there way mix configurations such controllers registered via code, interceptors done in web.config?

is there way register of controllers via web.config single component element?

i guees not

is there way mix configurations such controllers registered via code, else done in web.config?

sure. let have 1 of controller depending on specific service.
can register controllers via fluent api did , register single service explicitly in config.
keep in mind register in config registered first int container.
order registration relevant in case of multiple registration same interface, not resolution itself.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more

erlang - Saving a digraph to mnesia is hindered because of its side-effects -

-
updated the digraph library in erlang implements data type side-effectful. each operation on data type saves new state in ets table -- instead of returning altered version of itself, more common in functional languages. the problem usage perspective, impedes effort store or pass around state in convenient way requiring me first "collect" state before can start juggle around. the closest solution have seen far serializer/deserializer , these have drawback tied current structure of digraphs instead of operating on abstract type -- prevents future proof solution. update pascal pointed out serializer utilizes interface of digraph, , hence eliminates drawback mentioned above. better, albeit still inconvenient, see no better alternative. what recommendation on how store digraphs? should go different data type altogether? thanks. i not sure understand concern. fact digraph stored in ets transparent in user interface, might want chnge either exchange digr...
Read more