asp.net mvc - using the same partial view with different buttons -

-

i have following partial view, lists users in table. each row has enroll button, enrolls user selected course.

i need same view task. however, need add users discussions (instead of enrolling them course). know can create view , change enroll buttons add buttons.

however, wonder if there more effective way of doing this. approach not seem easy maintain.

@model ienumerable<applicationuser> <h4>search results:</h4> <table class="table-condensed" style="font-size:smaller">     @foreach (var item in model)     {         <tr>             <td>                 @html.displayfor(modelitem => item.firstname)             </td>             <td>                 @html.displayfor(modelitem => item.lastname)             </td>             <td>                 @html.displayfor(modelitem => item.email)             </td>             <td>                 <input class="btn_enroll" data-userid="@item.id" value="enroll" type="button" />             </td>         </tr>     }  </table>  <script>     $(".btn_enroll").click(function () {         //code enrolling         var course_id = $("#hdn_selectedcourseid").val();     }) </script>

one way setting attribute of calling action method render view 

<table class="table-condensed" style="font-size:smaller" data-module="@viewdata["module"]"></table>

and use in js code

<script> $(".btn_enroll").click(function () {     //code enrolling     var course_id = $("#hdn_selectedcourseid").val();     var moduletype = $(this).closest("table").attr("data-module");     if (moduletype === "enroll")     {         //do enrollment     }     else if (moduletype === "discussion")     {         //discuss here     }   })

for example on home page have links like

   @html.actionlink("enrollment", "index", new { module = "enroll" })    @html.actionlink("discussion", "index", new { module = "discussion" })

and applicationusercontroller has index action this

public actionresult index(string module) {     viewdata["module"] = module;      return view(); }

however if scope of project or requirements can change enrollment and/or discussion better keep separate avoid complexity of code in single page in single js code.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more