loops - clojure.lang.Lazysez cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn -

-

hey im making a* search on 8 puzzle , have 2 main questions.

fixed: first clojure.lang.lazysez cannot cast clojure.lang.ifn when run on line in second part of polymorph in loop im not sure why.

here code:

(defn a-star    ([board history]       (if  (at-end? board) (println board)     (            (let [options (filter #(possible-move? % board) *moves*)                 move (into (pm/priority-map) (for [move options] [move (global-man-dis       (move-tile board move))]))]                (for [pair move :let [next-move (key pair)]]                    (do                    (println (move-tile board next-move))                   (a-star (move-tile board next-move) next-move (conj history board))                  )               )           )     )))      ([board prev-move history]       (if (or (at-end? board) (history-check history board)) (println board)     (        (let [options (get-queue board (dont-go-back prev-move))             move (into (pm/priority-map) (for [move options] [move (global-man-dis     (move-tile board move))]))]          (for [pair move :let [next-move (key pair)]]              (do              (println (move-tile board next-move))             (a-star (move-tile board next-move) next-move (conj history board))            )          )        )      ))))    (defn -main [& args]   (println "insert list numbers no spaces or letters")   (def board (mapv (fn [^character c] (character/digit c 10)) (read-line)))   ;(def testt [0 8 4 7 2 1 3 5 6])   ;(def testt [1 2 3 5 4 6 8 0 7])   (a-star board [])   )

tried since post: removing "else" parens around let statement returns nothing fixed removed else parenthesis , changed doseq lazy , wont output in case. ill ask other question seperatly again

some of base cases in a-star return lazy sequences. calling output of a-star function, because of pair of parens around let statements.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more