scheme - Creating a new image with scriptfu -

-

i'm experimenting script-fu, trying teach myself how use it. have following basic script, thought create, display, new image:

(define (script-fu-test)   (let*       (        (image (car (gimp-image-new 10 10 rgb)))        )     (gimp-display-new image)     (gimp-context-pop)     )   )

i'm calling script so:

./gimp-2.8 -i -b '(script-fu-test)'

and it's failing, so:

batch command experienced execution error: error: ( : 32662) procedure execution of gimp-display-new failed

anyone have hint might messing here?

i'm running on mac os x (ie /applications/gimp.app/contents/macos/gimp-2.8)

when try use simplified version of code, following results:

$ gimp -b '(gimp-display-new (car (gimp-image-new 10 10 rgb)))' batch command executed  $ gimp -i -b '(gimp-display-new (car (gimp-image-new 10 10 rgb)))' batch command experienced execution error

note in first case there's no -i, user interface available. in second case, there's -i, there's no user interface. can't use gimp-display-new without interface. can't use gimp-display-new in no-interface mode mentioned in:

  • re: script can't connect perl server on gimp-perl mailing list

    make sure start gimp in batch mode line: 

    gimp --no-interface --batch '(extension-perl-server 1 0 0)' &

    but means can't gimp-display-new, extremely useful debugging. use interactive gimp when writing new image generation code, , --no-interface during production.

  • the "linux latex-pdf how-to" udo schuermann, says:

    note, "1" first argument in commands refers fact script run in non-interactive mode. i've commented out (gimp-display-new img) command; if ran in interactive mode not prompt various parameters produce image window show result. not want bother visible stuff , interactive operations in project. onwards go:"


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How Configure Devart dotConnect for SQLite Code First? -

-
can configure following sample code ? when run following code, error : no entity framework provider found ado.net provider invariant name 'devart.data.sqlite' setting in machine.config <system.data> <dbproviderfactories> <add name="dotconnect sqlite" invariant="devart.data.sqlite" description="devart dotconnect sqlite" type="devart.data.sqlite.sqliteproviderfactory, devart.data.sqlite, version=4.6.287.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=09af7300eec23701" /> </dbproviderfactories> </system.data> after add below block code in app.config <?xml version="1.0"?> <configuration>   <configsections> <!-- more information on entity framework configuration, visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=237468 --> <section name="entityframework" type="system.data.entity.internal.configfile.entityframeworksection, entit...
Read more

java - Copying object fields -

-
what best way of copying classes when need have 2 independent variables? have simple class: public class myclass { boolean = false; string b= "not empty"; } do need make method : assign(myclass data ) { a= data.a; b= data.b; } is there automatic method copy (duplicate) objects in java? do need make method : pretty close. instead of making method, should make constructor. such constructors called copy constructor , , create them this: myclass(myclass data) { = data.a; b = data.b; } and create copy of instance, use constructor this: myclass obj1 = new myclass(); myclass obj2 = new myclass(obj1); copy constructor can tedious : using copy constructor create deep-copy can tedious, when class has mutable fields. in case, assignment create copy of reference, , not object itself. have create copy of fields (if want deep copy). can go recursive. a better way create deep copy serialize , deserialize object. why not use clone()? ...
Read more

c++ - Clear the memory after returning a vector in a function -

-
i have function processes , stores lot of data in , returns results vector of class. amount of data stored in function tremendous , want clear storage memory of function after finished job. necessary (does function automatically clear memory) or should clear memory function? update: vector<customers> process(char* const *filename, vector<int> id) { vector<customers> list_of_customers; (perform actions) return list_of_customers; } variables defined locally within function automatically released @ end of function scope. destructors objects called, should free memory allocated objects (if objects coded correctly). example of such object std::vector . anything you've allocated new must have corresponding delete release storage. try avoid doing own allocation , use raii instead, i.e. containers or smart pointers.
Read more